Implementasi Diagnosis Organisasi pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta (PTS) di Kota Jambi

Jonner Simarmata, Said Almaududi


Organizational effectiveness  positively impacts sustainability and competitiveness of organizations. Higher Education is no exception.  To gain sustainability and  effectiveness of organizations, diagnosis should be implemented regularly. In theory, organizations that implement diagnosis regularly have sustainable competitiveness. Today, Higher Educations face tough competition due to many factors suchs as globalization, technological advancement, and rapid demographic changes. This current research aims at implementing organizational diagnosis on Private Higher Educations (PHEs) in Jambi City. Specifically, the purpose of this diagnosis is to know how effective is the organizations in terms of purpose, structure, leadership, relationship, rewards, mechanism, attitutde toward changes, and learning practices. For this purpose, a set of questionaires were distributed to respondents who were cluster-randomly selected from four institutions. Data analysis shows that in general higher education organization in Jambi City is considered  sufficiently effective. This suggests that improvement should be made. In particular, there are three organizational aspects that respondents give the lowest score. They are reward system, attitude toward changes, and learning practices. This means that these three variabels should be given more attention by top managers.


Organizational Diagnosis, Organizational Effectiveness, Private Higher Educations

Full Text:



Adair, J. 2007, Develop your leader skills, London dan Philadelphia: Kogan Kage.

Akgen, A. E., J. C. Byrne, G. S. Lynn, & H. Keskin, 2007, Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol 20(6), 794-812.

Alderfer, C.P. 2011, The practice of organizational diagnosis: theory and methods, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Alegre & Chiva, 2008, assessing the impact of organoizational learning capablities on product innovation performance, Technovation 28(2008), 315-326.

BPS Kota Jambi, 2018, Kota Jambi dalam Angka 2018.

Burke, W.W., & G. H. Litwin, 1992, A causal model of organizational performance and change, Journal of Management, 18(3), 523-545.

Cooper, R., 2015, The Shared Services Organizational Model in Higher Education Enrollment Management: the Application of the Transactional Components of the Burke-Litwin Model of Organizational Performance and Change and the Moderating Effect of Employee Engagement on Individual Motivation, Human Resource Development Theses and Dissertations. Paper 9.

Cummings, T. G., & C. G. Worley, 2008, Organization Development & Change, Mason, USA: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Hamid, R., et al, 2011, The analysis of organizational diagnosis based on six box model in universities, Higher Education Studies, 1(1) 84-92.

Harrison, M.I., & A. Shirom, 1999, Organizational Diagnosis and Assessment: Bridging Theory and Practice, California, USA: Sage Publication.

Harvey, L., 2000, New realities: the relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education and Management.

Kemenristekdikti, 2017, Statistik Pendidikan Tinggi (Higher Education Statistical Year Book) 2017, Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi Iptek Dikti.

Lok, P., & J. Crawford, 2000, The application of a diagnostic model and surveys in organizational development, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(2), 108-125.

Mamilo, D., 2016, Increasing Organizational Effectiveness through Organizational Diagnosis Comparison Between Public Institutions in Kosovo and Albania, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Researchtechnology, Vol 5(7): 587-596.

Miles, J. A., 2012, Management and organization theory, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Preziosi, R., 1980, Organizational diagnosis Questionnaire, the 1980 annual handbook for group facilitators, New Jersey, NJ: University Associates.

Saeed, B.B., & W. Wang, 2013a, Organizational diagnosis: a survey of the literature and proposition of new diagnostic model, Int. J. Information Systems and Change management, 6(3), 222-238.

Saeed, B.B., & W. Wang, 2013b, The Art of Organizational Diagnosis, Pathogens and Remedies, iBusiness, 5, 55-58.

Simarmata, J., 2018, Praktek manajemen kinerja dan kinerja organisasi pada Universitas Batanghari: peran budaya organisasi sebagai variabel moderator, J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains), Vol 3(2), 137-145.

Stegerean, R., C. Gavera, & A. Marin, 2010, The application of diagnostic model: an empirical study, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Negotia, LV, 5, 3-11.

Sugiyono, 2013, Metode penelitian manajemen, Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Weisbord, M. R., 1976, Organizational Diagnosis: six places to look for trouble with or without theory, Group & Organization Studies, 1(4), 430-447.

Whitfield, G., & R. Landeros, 2006, Supplier Diversity Effectiveness: Does Organizational Culture Really Matter?, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42, 16-28.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen dan Sains) Published by Master of Management Program, Faculty of Economics, Batanghari University
Adress: Fakultas Ekonomi, Jl.Slamet Ryadi, Broni-Jambi, Kec.Telanaipura, Kodepos: 36122, email:

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.